Back to required readings:

On Dutch Book Arguments (lots of papers but unsorte for now)

• Hájek, Interpretations of Probability, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (section 3.3)
• Skyrms, Coherence (defends dutch books)
• Lewis, Why Conditionalize?
• Talbot, Dutch Book Arguments (an example of a diachronic dutch book)
• van Fraassen, Belief and the Will
• Skyrms, Coherence (chapter from Choice and Chance).
• Ramsey, Truth and Probability (the earliest dutch book argument and representation theorem)
• Kemeny, Fair Bets and Inductive Probabilities (proves the converse dutch book theorem)
• Hájek, Dutch Book Arguments
• Vineberg, The Notion of Consistency for Partial Beliefs
• Armendt, Dutch Books, Additivity, and Utility Theory
• Schick, Dutch Bookies and Money Pumps
• Weatherson, Begging the Question and Bayesianism
• Hájek, Scotching Dutch Books
• Christensen, Clever Bookies and Coherent Beliefs
• Maher, Diachronic Rationality
• Skyrms, A Mistake in Dynamic Coherence Arguments?
• Christensen, Dutch Books Depragmatized: Epistemic Consistency for Partial Believers
• Maher, Depragmatized Dutch Book Arguments (against Christensen)
• Christensen, Preference Based Arguments for Probabilism